How to Replace yfinance in a Python Script
August 21, 2026
Swapping the import takes a minute. Getting the same numbers back takes an afternoon, because the two libraries disagree about what a column called close contains. As of August 2026, the yfinance documentation gives yf.download() the defaults auto_adjust=True and multi_level_index=True, so a multi-ticker call returns adjusted OHLC under a MultiIndex. xfl.prices() returns one long DataFrame in which close is the raw as-traded price, adj_close is split-adjusted, and return_daily is total return including dividends. Fix the column meanings first and the frame shape second; the rest of the migration is renaming.
What changes inside the DataFrame?
Three things move, and only one of them is cosmetic.
Adjustment stops being a hidden default. The yfinance reference documents auto_adjust as “Adjust all OHLC automatically? Default is True”, which means the price columns of a plain yf.download() are already modified before the script sees them. xfinlink splits that decision across separate columns rather than a flag: close is never modified, adj_close carries the split adjustment, and return_daily carries the total return that a performance calculation actually needs. A script that swaps the call, keeps reading close, and computes a percentage change will now step across every split in the sample.
The frame shape changes from wide to long. One xfl.prices(["AAPL", "MSFT"]) call returns rows, not nested columns, with ticker and entity_id as identifier columns beside the date. Anything written against a MultiIndex needs a pivot, which is one line, and anything written as a groupby gets simpler.
Corporate actions arrive in the same frame instead of separate attributes. yfinance documents actions=False as the download() default and exposes Ticker.dividends, Ticker.splits and Ticker.actions separately; xfinlink returns dividend and split_ratio as fields of the price frame, on the ex-date and the split date respectively.
Which call replaces which?
Every yfinance name below is a documented attribute or function in the yfinance reference as of August 2026.
| yfinance | xfinlink | Note |
|---|---|---|
yf.download(tickers, ...), Ticker.history() |
xfl.prices(tickers, start=, end=, interval=, fields=) |
Daily and coarser; interval accepts 1d through 1y |
Ticker.dividends, Ticker.splits, Ticker.actions |
fields=["dividend", "split_ratio"] on xfl.prices() |
Same frame as the prices, no second call |
Ticker.income_stmt, balance_sheet, cashflow and the quarterly variants |
xfl.fundamentals(ticker, period_type="annual") |
Built from SEC filings; annual statements reach 1950 on paid plans |
Ticker.info |
xfl.metrics(ticker, fields=[...]) |
A typed DataFrame; categories include valuation, profitability, leverage and growth |
Ticker.insider_transactions |
xfl.insiders(ticker, ...) |
Form 3, 4 and 5 transactions, one row each |
Ticker.institutional_holders |
xfl.holdings(ticker, quarter="2026-03-31") |
Form 13F, one row per manager, security and quarter |
| No equivalent | xfl.index("sp500", as_of="2015-06-30") |
Point-in-time constituents for sp500, ndx100, djia and russell2000 |
| No equivalent | xfl.resolve("META"), xfl.prices(entity_id=...) |
Company identity across ticker changes and ticker reuse |
What does yfinance still cover that xfinlink does not?
Intraday bars, for one. The yfinance documentation lists intervals down to 1m with the caveat that “Intraday data cannot extend last 60 days”, which is enough for a short-horizon study and something xfinlink does not serve at all; daily is the finest interval on this side. Options chains through Ticker.option_chain, analyst estimates and revisions, fund holdings through funds_data, and a news feed are all documented yfinance attributes with no counterpart here.
There is also nothing to sign up for. The quick start in the yfinance documentation constructs yf.Ticker("MSFT") with no authentication step, while xfinlink wants a key on every call. For a weekend script that pulls one chart, that difference is real.
Those are different jobs from the one a daily research pipeline does. Nothing forces an all-or-nothing move either: an options call can stay where it is while the daily history moves.
How do you check the migration worked?
Two checks catch most of the damage, and a third confirms the frame shape. Run the first pair on a known split and on a large dividend payer, because those are the places where a column swap changes the answer without changing the shape of the output.
import xfinlink as xfl
xfl.set_api_key("YOUR_API_KEY") # free at https://xfinlink.com/signup
px = xfl.prices("NVDA", start="2024-06-05", end="2024-06-12",
fields=["close", "adj_close", "split_ratio"]).sort_values("date")
px["split_ratio"] = px["split_ratio"].fillna(1.0)
print(px[["date", "close", "adj_close", "split_ratio"]].to_string(index=False))
vz = xfl.prices("VZ", start="2021-08-02", end="2026-07-31",
fields=["adj_close", "return_daily"]).sort_values("date")
price_return = vz["adj_close"].iloc[-1] / vz["adj_close"].iloc[0] - 1
total_return = (1 + vz["return_daily"].iloc[1:]).prod() - 1
print(f"\nVZ 2021-08-02 to 2026-07-31: price {price_return:.1%}, total {total_return:.1%}")
wide = (xfl.prices(["AAPL", "MSFT", "NVDA"], start="2024-06-05", end="2024-06-12",
fields=["adj_close"])
.pivot(index="date", columns="ticker", values="adj_close"))
print("\n" + wide.to_string())
date close adj_close split_ratio 2024-06-05 1224.40002 122.440002 1.0 2024-06-06 1209.97998 120.997998 1.0 2024-06-07 1208.88000 120.888000 1.0 2024-06-10 121.79000 121.790000 10.0 2024-06-11 120.91000 120.910000 1.0 2024-06-12 125.20000 125.200000 1.0 VZ 2021-08-02 to 2026-07-31: price -16.1%, total 2.7% ticker AAPL MSFT NVDA date 2024-06-05 195.87000 424.01001 122.440002 2024-06-06 194.48000 424.51999 120.997998 2024-06-07 196.89000 423.85001 120.888000 2024-06-10 193.12000 427.87000 121.790000 2024-06-11 207.14999 432.67999 120.910000 2024-06-12 213.07001 441.06000 125.200000
NVIDIA split 10-for-1 on 10 June 2024. The close column drops from 1208.88 to 121.79 across that date because that is what the stock traded at, while adj_close runs 120.888 to 121.790 without a step. If a migrated script shows a 90% single-day loss somewhere in 2024, it is reading close where it used to read an adjusted series.
Verizon is the second check. Over five years to 31 July 2026 the price fell 16.1% while the total return was positive 2.7%, so the sign of the answer depends entirely on which column the script reads. Dividend payers are where a quiet column mismatch turns into a wrong conclusion rather than a small error. The distinction is worked through in split adjustment explained and in where to get historical dividend data.
What can the script do after the swap?
Ticker strings stop being the primary key. xfl.resolve() returns a stable entity_id for each company that has used a ticker, along with its SEC CIK and its FIGI, and the price, statement, metric, insider and holdings functions each accept entity_id= in place of a ticker. That is what makes a company reachable after it renames itself, and what stops a study from picking up a different issuer that inherited the same three letters later. Delisted names stay reachable the same way, which is the usual reason a yfinance-era backtest reads too optimistic; survivorship bias in backtesting covers that case in full.
Universes gain a date. xfl.index("sp500", as_of="2015-06-30") returns the roster as it stood on that day rather than today’s members mapped backwards, so a screen run over history is not quietly restricted to the companies that survived to the present.
Statements, insider transactions and 13F holdings sit behind the same identifier as the prices, so a pipeline that already resolved a company does not need a second identity system to join filings to bars. An MCP server exposes the same functions to a language model when the eventual consumer is an assistant rather than a notebook; the setup is in the docs.
Start on the free key, which covers a rolling one-year window at 100 requests a day and one ticker per call. Paid plans lift both the history floor and the per-call ticker cap, and the current numbers are on the pricing page.
FAQ
Can both libraries live in the same project?
Yes. They are ordinary Python packages with no shared state. Keeping yfinance for an options chain while daily history comes from xfl.prices() is a normal setup.
What replaces auto_adjust=True?
Two columns instead of one flag: adj_close for a split-adjusted price series, return_daily for total return including dividends. Compound return_daily rather than differencing adj_close whenever dividends matter.
Is Yahoo Finance data usable in a commercial product?
The yfinance README states that the library “is intended for research and educational purposes” and that “the Yahoo! finance API is intended for personal use only”, and it points readers to Yahoo’s terms. The longer answer is in can you use Yahoo Finance data commercially.
How far back does the history go?
Daily prices reach 1996, financial statements 1950, and institutional holdings 1978 on paid plans. A free key sees a rolling twelve months of each.
Built with xfinlink — free financial data API for Python. pip install -U xfinlink
pip install -U xfinlink